34,C,推理判断题。根据第五段“To be sure,it is hard to imagine competitors like Procter&Gamble and Unilevervoluntarily...But...dollars lost each year from single-use plastics that are burned or landfilled-and...the healthrisks linked to thousands of poorly studied chemicals in plastics-brands may find their corner is harder to defend.Legally,it could be argued that the damage caused by custom packaging outweighs any harm caused to brands fromstandardized containers..(减然,很难想象宝洁和联合利华等竞争对手会自愿同意将他们的洗发水装人相同颠色的瓶子中。但是,随着数据不断显示,每年因焚烧或填埋一次性塑料而损失数十亿美元,且研究揭示了塑料中数千种研究不足的化学物质与健康风险之间的更多联系,品牌方可能会发现他门的立场越来越难以捍卫。从法律角度讲,可以认为定制包装造成的损害超过了标准化容器对品牌造成的任何损害,)”可以推断出,这些品牌面临多重日益加剧的压力。故选C。35,C。主旨大意题。通读全文,尤其是第三段可知,本文主要讲的是塑料包装的回收与再利用问题,以及标准化包装在推动循环经济中的关键作用,因此最好的标题是C选项“Shared Design,Cyclic Future(共享设计,循环未来)”。故选C。